#!/usr/bin/perl # (C) Copy and Copyright 2006-2010 WebmasterWorld Inc. All Rights Reserved. require "data/varsv5.cgi"; # parses form values print "Content-type: text/plain\n\n"; $agent = $ENV{'HTTP_USER_AGENT'}; if ($FORM{"view"} eq "producecode") { open(FILE,"; close(FILE); exit; } # Simple agent check to keep the snoopy happy and to keep bad bots out and good bots in. if ($agent =~ /slurp/gi || $agent =~ /msnbot/gi || $agent =~ /Jeeves/gi || $agent =~ /googlebot/gi) { open(FILE,"; close(FILE); } else { print qq|# # # (C) Copy and Copyright 2006-2010 WebmasterWorld Inc. All Rights Reserved. # http://www.webmasterworld.com/robots.txt # This code found here: http://www.webmasterworld.com/robots.txt?view=producecode # # Please, we do not allow nonauthorized robots. They are a major drag on the system. # Actual robots.txt can always be found here for: http://www.webmasterworld.com/robots2 # Old full robots.txt can be found here: http://www.webmasterworld.com/robots3 # # Any unauthorized bot running will result in IP's being banned. # Agent spoofing is considered a bot - if it looks like a bot and not from an SE - it is a bot. # Honey pots are - and have been - running. If your access has been blocked for bot running - please sticky an admin for a reinclusion request. # # http://www.searchengineworld.com/robots/ # User-agent: * Disallow: / # [:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:] # # # # ---------------------------=*> THE BOT BLOG <*=-------------------------- # # # # [:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:][:] # # =========================================================================== # # # # Sleep Deprivation 101 # # # # by brett tabke # # 3/4/2007 # # # # =========================================================================== # # # # I was looking at this earlier tonight for the first # time in a few weeks. It has been so hard to keep motivated at it. # So, sorry I haven't updated this in awhile. It has been a # whirlwind bunch of months in a row for me and my family. # # In Dec, me and Erika celebrated the arrival of our # first daughter Eleanor. I essentially took an extended # couple of months off. I logged in to take care of some fires # and make sure everyone was getting paid. Other than # that, a couple hours a day to keep the email churning # was about it. This was the longest work break I have # taken since college in the early 80's. # http://www.webmasterworld.com/webmasterworld/3191522.htm # # What a change of life it has been. From the sleep # deprivation to the complete restructuring of our lives, # it has been a time of adjustment. The biggest change, # has been that it really puts the internet and our work # here on it into a whole new in perspective. It really # reminded me what was important. # # Before that, last falls PubCon was a huge project as well. # I have never worked so hard as those last few months. It # was 4am to 10pm most days from August to early December. # It was so well worth it, as we had an awesome event. Thanks # to everyone who participated and attended. # # I am still digging out from a lot of email going back to November. # Please be patient as I am still working through it all. # Delayed - not forgotten - and thanks for understanding. # # The only blog was pretty big, so I moved the old # blog entries over to here: # http://www.webmasterworld.com/robots-blog.txt # # I am off to TRAFFIC Vegas this week. # http://www.targetedtraffic.com/ # # Brett Tabke # # # =========================================================================== # # # # Waiting to Exhale # # # # by brett tabke # # 9/1/2006 # # # # =========================================================================== # # # re: http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum10/9410.htm # # -------------------------------------------------- # Smart money said that Alan Meckler was going to # do for Search, what Comdex did for the DotCom and # what CES did for home electronics. # -------------------------------------------------- # # # August 2nd, 2005. Was a watershed day in the history of SEO/SEM. # That was the day Jupiter sold SearchEngineWatch and the SES # conferences to Incisive Media. After the events of this week with # Danny Sullivan announcing his resignation from SearchEngineWatch, I # think it is worth rolling back the clock to that fateful day and # looking at the sale of the site and conferences again. # # http://www.incisivemedia.com/ # http://www.daggle.com/ # http://www.SearcheEgineWatch.com # http://weblogs.jupitermedia.com/meckler/ # # Search was sky rocketing a year ago. Google and the search sectors # growth was spectacular. Adsense and other forms of advertising were # setting new records every month. From SEO/SEM firms to mom-n-pops, # we not only had survived the dot com crash - we came out stronger # and more profitable because of it. Everyone was making out like # bandits. At the time of the sale, Jupiter was doing great. Sullivan had # the conference side of the conferences running like a well oiled # machine and the trade show side was also jamming. SES was growing # by 20-50% per-conference. The site was also rocking and hitting every # note a webmaster should be hitting today. There are/were 20+ ads on # the home page alone going for a rumored \$4-5k a month - talk about # your million dollar homepage! Life was good at Jupiter and certainly # in the search space. # # http://finance.google.com/finance?q=GOOG # # Jupiter didn't appear to be hurting. Sure the stock price was flat, # but not crashing by any means. The outlook for Jupiter was fairly bright # and positive. Alan Mecklers fixation with the images seemed to be # mostly harmless. Who knows, he may have been on to - still might be - # something really big with all that recurring billing. In a few old # school circles, soft licensing and recurring billing are the holy grail, # come-to-jesus, show-me-the-money of business models. Seriously, guys # like Bill Gates did all right by soft licensing (grin). # # With Jupiter hitting on all cylinders, I just think that at the time # of the SES sale, Meckler should have been standing back screaming at # the troops to saddle up. It was a time to redouble their efforts. It # was setup already. It was a time to hitch up the team and go to town # on a rail. # # Business maven Tom Peters used to say that the time to sell like # hell" is when "you are already selling like hell"! You have to # strike the iron when the metal is hot. Nothing was hotter than # "Search" was last year. # # http://www.tompeters.com/ # # The selling of SES at that time, just did not make sense. Everyone # I talked to about it was bewildered. Why sell SES? It was a # stunning and shocking move to those of us in the industry. No one # could wrap their brain around it. Daddy Warbucks - dude - buddy - # what the? Go round the bend!? Was Meckler getting ready to retire? # Has he ticked off the major sponsors? Has he been put on notice? Is # there some balloon payment due in the backwaters of Jupiters books # that no one knows about? Contracts due to expire and no renewals in # site? Someone calling in a loan? Does he think there is another # bubble crash imminent? Missed a margin call? A greedy ex wife? Like # the ponies too much? Ha! you could go crazy spinning the scenarios. # # http://weblogs.jupitermedia.com/meckler/ # # Alan Meckler is a seasoned business pro. There are few in the tech # space that have his years of real world seat-of-the-pants first hand # old fashioned education you can only get from decades of on-the-job # training. Aside from that sentence turning a record number of # cliches per column inch, it's true! Meckler is that old and # experienced in this space. His name alone is almost a cliche! # Alan built the awesome Internet World trade show and conference and # he built SES. You don't fall off a turnip truck and wake up with # domains like Internet.com, ClickZ, and SearchEngineWatch. With Alan # at the helm of Jupiter, we were getting that old deja vu Internet # World feeling all over again. It just stood to reason that Alan Meckler # was going to do for Search, what Comdex did for the DotCom and what CES # did for home electronics. # # For our part, we were just trying to stay out of the way - to keep # from ending up road kill. Jupiter needed a wide berth. We mulled # over thoughts of getting on the Jupiter wagon. We even met with the # big guy himself (thanks for the lunch!). There was no kidding # ourselves about our future direction. We were just caught in the # draft of it all. We were along for the ride whether we wanted to or # not - sucked in to the wake of the SES/SEW vortex. Fates and # fortunes are intertwined. So goes Jupiter - so goes WebmasterWorld. # It is the pure definition of that new catch word from competition # and cooperation: co-opetition. There were days I could see my # handwriting on SES/SEW, and I am sure there are days Danny saw his # on PubCon/WebmasterWorld. And why not!? We are all doing well - # making money - having fun - cranking out 7 figure daily traffic # numbers - traveling the world - partying like rock stars - three # finger snaps in a Z formation - cue the music - baby, we # were Living La Vida Loca! # # So along comes the SES sale to a no name company that no one # stateside had every heard of and who had no history in this space. # Most analysts felt that the sale price of \$43 million was pretty # cheap at the time. The public explanations about it didn't match the # reality of the sale. Alan Meckler is as wise an old owl as there is # on the net today. This stuff doesn't happen in a vacuum. There was # another shoe to drop. Befuddled and not a smoking gun in sight. # That left the only plausible explanation to be the simple face value # one: that \$43 million in the hand is better than the vast unknown in # the future bush. # # We had a sharp consultant working for us a year ago. She was helping # with a long term business plan and strategy. She did a study of the # seo/sem/conference sector. Her work, was all top notch. Stuff we # read about in business books, but we never thought we could actually # have completed. As she was presenting the competitive Intel on # Jupiter/Incisive to us, she talked a bit about the sale of ClickZ/SES. # She made a comment that now seems pretty insightful: # # "I would be curious to see Danny Sullivans contract. It is # the only variable we don't know about." # # As they say; that knowledge and \$3.75 will still buy you a small # coffee at Starbucks. The only thing we could do was go back to work # and continue improving and producing our sites and conferences. We # always knew there was going to come a day when "the rest of the # story" would come out. We put our heads down and focused on our work # - that is all we have ever tried to do. Competition will always be # there. One of my all time heroes Jonny Carson told Dave Letterman # when he was in 3rd place of 3 talk shows to: "forget about the other # guys and what they are doing. Focus on your thing, your audience and # what you do best". I had a full plate running my own business and # didn't need to dedicate any more brain power to thinking about it. I # knew it would work out. This too shall pass. # # So, Yesterday when I read the news that Danny was leaving Search # Engine Watch, I honestly was not all that surprised. 13 months # later, Alan Mecklers other shoe hits the floor. I finally exhaled. # # From there, you lead into all kinds of questions about the state of # Danny's contract going back more than a year to the time of the sale. # psst: Apparently, he did not have a noncompete. Hello!? I can only # imagine he refused to renew at some point or the right phase of the # moon... Ack, stop that. Here we go again with margin calls and ex # wives... So lets get off that track and say we did but we didn't explore # those possibilities. As much guilty pleasure fun as it would be to play # "what if", I have some sanity to think about you know. We'll leave # the rest of that as an excersize for the reader and ask good old # Bones McCoy to bail us out: dam it Jim. I'm a conference # producer - not a mind reader! # # Lets cut to the chase: \$43 million for SEW/SES/ClickZ without Danny # Sullivan locked into a long term contract and no non-compete? (belly # laugh) Raise a virtual glass to Mr. Alan Meckler. You old dog you - # nicely done sir! Daddy warbucks is back at the top of my list! # # http://weblogs.jupitermedia.com/meckler/archives/014664.html # http://weblogs.jupitermedia.com/meckler/archives/009626.html # # I know for about six months I have been increasingly concerned about # the industry. There was something soothing and calming about SES San # Jose, but it seemed so status quo to borderline "been there - done # that". # # I've been thinking the industry was going to see more rapid change # again this year. Last year was about consolidation and acquisition. # This year has been about, huh? Not much really. There has been a # vacum. No defining moment until now. So far, that hole is being # filled with the Web 2.0 talk. Hey, Web 2.0, is proof that people need to # talk about something. # # Me and a good friend were chatting a few months ago that we knew we # were probably going to see some shake up at SearchEngineWatch this # year. You see, Danny Sullivan just turned 40 this year. I don't care # who you are, the big four oh works on a man in weird ways. I know it # does. I've been there recently. I have the new convertible sports # car to prove it. We thought Danny would get a dog or something - not # leave SEW! # # All the possibilities are swirling. It reminds me of something I # have never talked about much. Six years ago I was faced with a # difficult choice between the words: SearchEngine and the word # Webmaster. Those two domains SearchEngineWorld and WebmasterWorld # were both powerful in my mind and both were/are extremely brandable # domains. I have been telling myself that I choose WebmasterWorld # because I wanted to go horizontal and not vertical with the topics. # I wanted to cover both search and webmaster related site operation # and management. I still feel they are not divorceable from one another. # You can't talk search, without immediatly getting to page and then # server issues. That intention still covers the basics of my # reasoning at the time and without that desire I never would have # chosen WebmasterWorld over SearchEngineWorld. I knew that I was # choosing the one that would ultimately be the horse we would ride. I # realize that some of that decision process was the gnawing fact that # I didn't want SearchEngineWorld to compete with SearchEngineWatch. I # didn't want to muddle the waters of branding. I can distinctly # remember trying to find another domain because I didn't want the # branding confusion. When I first registered SeearchEngineWorld, I # just thought it was a cool name. Even in 99, Danny had done a great # job at positioning SearchEngineWatch as a good brand. I never # intended to see SearchEngineWorld wither and get forgotten. That was # more from the fact I could never find my Chris Sherman, than any # other factor. Guys like Chris don't grow on trees. # # http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/technology/archives/2006/08/31/dont_go_danny_we_love_you.html # # I think the change may do us all some good. Other than our reaction # to it, we dont' have a big choice in the matter. We need a bit of a # status quo shake up. The conferences and the sites are getting # fairly mature. Change is ultimately good. # # I doubt Danny will have any problem finding work (grin). I can only imagine # he has a tough task of deciding what he wants to do next. Think # about it for a minute: Imagine you could do anything you want with # almost anyone you wanted to in your industry? The world is your # oyster. How would you decide? Ultimately, I think Danny will follow # his passions and the things he finds most fulfilling in life. # # It is also interesting to to see that Susan Bratton is leaving as # the Chair of Ad-Tech. I believe we will see Susan pop up somewhere # very soon. When I first met Susan, it was a huried introduction at a # conference. I recognized the look and the brusque stick-to-business # style. That is the same look I see in clips of me from our # conferences. At the time, I flat out - umm - didn't get her. Then # Mike 'rock on' Grehan took us all out for dinner in London. We # had a nice time and talk with Susan. Then I stumbled on to one of # her shows on WebmasterRadio and she started to make perfect sense. # Maybe she has found her forte in Radio instead of conferences? # Either way, her rolodex is a whos-who of the entire marketing # industry. I doubt she'll have trouble finding work. From the whispers # of the rumor mill, Susan was never highly compensated at Fad Tech. I # could see her doing other conferences soon. However, I wonder if her # contract allows it? # # http://blog.dmnews.com/2006/07/24/drew-ianni-succeeds-susan-bratton-as-adtech-chair/ # # As for Incisive, this looks like it was a simple 1 plus 1 must equal # 2 business decision. It sounds like Danny was already making top # dollar on the circut and Incisive thought any more would be # financial suicide. Although we don't know alot about Incisive on # this side of the pond, they do alot of conferences and small trade # shows around the world. They are very well versed in the economics # of conferences. # # As for SES, it is an intersting pickle Incisive is in. The large # sponsors are locked in contracts for another year. That's Mr. # Meckler's handy work in action again. Before Alan brought that to Search # conferences, there were only a few super large conferences that # could get sponsors to lock in for a year at a time. That means that # SES is directly funded through SES San Jose next year. Contracts # are reserved on the conference space and other conference associated # services. You can't just show up at a Hilton in New York or the San # Jose convention center without a year+ advance reservation. # # Regardless of the over all appearance or make up of those # conferences - those conferences are locked in for the most part. We # have also heard (know) that many speakers also have had their # expenses covered to these shows. A few of them go back many years on # the circut. Some, simply wouldn't have a career, let alone a # speaking slot if it weren't for Danny and SES. Many will continue # to ride the SES horse for as long as it has legs. Then there are the # attendees. Most of the NYC crowd is corporate Madison Avenue. Same # goes for San Jose. What that means, is that many of those people # already have it in next years budget to attend those conferences and # whether DS's smiley face is up in front or not, there will be a # sizeable set of attendees present. # # Then there is the real value of a company and conference - the # people. The SES crew is strong. Karen and the gang have done an # incredible job over the years. I know just how important and # valuable those people are and I have the highest regard for them. # Trust me - running, planning, and executing a conference the size # of SES is no easy task and experienced people are very few and far # between. # # I think Chris Sherman has been contributing a ton of stuff to SES # over the last few years. He has organized many panels and session # tracks - exclusively doing many of them. # # What I am getting to - tipping toeing around - is that for the short # term over the next year, SES doesn't flounder too far. Sponsors, # exhibitors, speakers, and attendees - it's a dead lock. Attendance # may suffer, and the quality of the sessions may suffer - but the # beat goes on. Incisive has six to nine months to figure it all # out. That is if Danny doesn't throw a curve ball their way. # # Where Incisive is truely going to miss DS, is on the site. # SearchEngineWatch *is* Danny Sullivan. And despite all the blog # stuff, guest writers and moderators - whatever dude - # searchenginewatch is Dannys off spring. Always has been - and always # will be... # # For our part - fresh opportunies open up. The phone has been ringing # alot this week. The popular question has been about speaking in # Vegas and next years conferences. Yes, we still have few slots to # fill for Vegas. # # http://www.pubcon.com/session_proposal.cgi # # All-in-all, things will work out ok I think. # # Brett # =========================================================================== # # # # BestBBS 4.0 # # # # by brett tabke # # 7/8/2006 # # # # =========================================================================== # # # # We have just completed a significant update to the forum software # (BestBBS) that we run on WebmasterWorld. # # The majority of this update was an internal database format # conversion. It took well over 300 hours of labor to convert the # system to the new formats. When completed, we have a faster, more # secure system than we have ever had before. # # The change was necessary to fix a long standing database design # issue. The problem was exposed as the shear scale of WebmasterWorld # grew to what it is today. I first wrote the database routines for # this software in 1998. I felt it would handle 10,000 messages. At # the time, that was an enormous amount of messages for a web based # bbs/forum system. The system now has over 2 million. The old system # consisted of two files for every thread. We have converted that to # one file per thread. # # I have often been asked why we did not switch to a true database # system such as SQL. The issue has always been one of speed. The # issue has been negated somewhat due to faster machines. However, the # core of WebmasterWorld is still written in Perl - which is # notoriously slow at database routines - when compared to languages # with builtin C bases SQL routines such as PHP. That said, we have # laid in provisions for major future changes (read: SQL) to all the # database routines. # # Unfortunately in spite of all that effort, there is little to be # seen new on the user side for the moment. The majority of these # changes were under-the-hood. # # The most visible change noticed by members will be the new keyword # URL system. We maintain the old files at their existing urls, while # at the same time introducing new keyword based urls for the future. # For example: # # Old url: # # http://www.WebmasterWorld.com/forum30/ # # new URL: # # http://www.WebmasterWorld.com/google/ # # It is significant to note, that your old bookmarks to specific # discussions will continue to work. However, the index pages for each # forum will slowly be changed over to the new keyword URL based # system. # # Another thing you will notice, is the spartan look of pages when # logged out. By not looking up member info on each message, we remove # a massive chunk of overhead on the system. # # More here: # http://www.webmasterworld.com/webmasterworld/3000001.htm # # -bt # =========================================================================== # # # # The PayPal Wars # # # # by brett tabke # # 6/27/2006 # # # # =========================================================================== # # # disclosure: I am on the PayPal developers advisory board. # # I was just studying the GBuy thread closer than I have looked # and studied an issue in years. This could be the biggest # competitive struggle we have seen since Microsoft vs Netscape. # http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum86/4534.htm # # Google vs Microsoft/Yahoo/AskJeeves, is/was for the shear horse race # and sportsmanship value. I feel like the community has a clear # interest in the outcome, but as a whole - regardless of the battle - # we will continue and our outcome/survival is assured. # # GBuy vs PayPal/Ebay though...this is a different kind of front here. # Really for the first time, Google is poised to step into unknown # water with ZERO experience at a real "all grown up" playing field. # # When we look at some of Googles bigger offerings, a trend towards # geekdom comes out: # # Gmail - email systems are so 1996 with off-the-shelf programs # available. They are 'techie' things. # Maps - there we are with window dressing on a Microsoft (Terra # server) product from 97. # Online Advertising buying/selling are essentially off-the-shelf..oldschool. # # What else? When you look down the list of G offerings, there # is little that Google has done up until now that is not purely # "net related nerdvana stuff". # http://www.google.com/intl/en/options/ # # But payments? This is an odd-man-out - a sunflower in the # daisy patch. I can't help but remember back to when Red Had IPO'd # and all the *nix geeks freaked out and wet themselves trying to # get in on the action or even understand it. Many of those same # geeks now work for Google. Have they learned anything? # # # Apparently - Googles main competitor for GBuy/GPayments will be # Ebay/PayPal. How ironic that the last month, I have been using spare # time to read, "The PayPal Wars" by Eric Jackson. # # The most striking thing about the PayPal story is just how deep into the # financial wars PayPal got. Their attempt at international monetary # domination was meet with a full frontal assault by everyone from the # powerful financial communities to the Russian Mafia. # # ------------------------------------------------------------ quote: # PayPal looked like a gold mine for crime rings as well as # sophisticated independent crooks trafficking in stolen credit cards. # ...With a CD-Rom full of stolen numbers and a robotic script designed # to open PayPal accounts, Internet-savvy criminals could easily # automate the creation of hundreds of thousands of dummy users. Those # feeder accounts could then use the stolen credit cards to send # payments through a layer or two of additional fraudulent accounts # before the criminal initiated an ACH to transfer the balance out of # the system. # ----------------------------------------------------------- /quote # # To say that PayPal is the most battle hardened dot com on the # web today is an understatement: # # ------------------------------------------------------------ quote: # When the Russian and Nigerian mafias rung up online charges, # they ultimately plundered PayPal, not the cardholder. While our # customer base continued its explosive growth, these brazen criminals # walked in through our front door and carried on their activities # largely unmolested. In what we would later refer to as "a # significant fraud episode," one such fraud ring cost the company # \$5.7 million over a four month period in mid-2000. # ----------------------------------------------------------- /quote # # From there we finally get some long over due answers from the PayPal # side of things. One doesn't need to dig too deep on the net to find # some very PO'd people teeing off on PayPal. There were a few, but # vocal group of people that had their PayPal accounts frozen in the # midst of the all out fraud assault on PayPal. It was always assumed # that those accounts were some how caught up in the fraud schemes # PayPal was fighting. For the first time, we have a few comments from # PayPal on the story: # # ------------------------------------------------------------ quote: # PayPals success in fighting back fraud also produced false # positives that inconvenienced honest users.... But as bad as the # false positives experience for innocent users and resulting negative # publicity for the company might have been, it was an acceptable # cost. The fact that spiraling fraud losses contributed to many of # our competitors, like eMoneyMail, PayMe, and PayPlace ceasing # operation made this an easy choice. Had PayPal not found a way to # get fraud under control, it would have destroyed the company. # ----------------------------------------------------------- /quote # # Whatever the outcome - this is going to get interesting. PayPal/Ebay # are clearly not a bunch of sheep. # # If you are looking for some insight into GBuy vs Ebay, I would read # the PayPal Wars. # # Questions still remaining: # - Has PayPal still got fight in them? # - Has Ebay Neutered PayPal? # - What could Ebays possible response be? # # # bt # #...The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese. # # =========================================================================== # # # # Wavers - Webmasters That Rode The Google Links Wave # # # # by brett tabke # # 5/18/2006 # # # # =========================================================================== # # A few moderators were asking if there was an over-abundance of dissatisfied # Google users these days? # # Riding the Google wave for a whole host of newbies was easy. They cracked # the Google algo :-) For the first five years of Google, you could # effectively sum up 80% of the Google algo this way: # # ======================================= # Google Algo = Get Links = Good Rankings # ======================================= # # That was the SEO expertise of an entire generation of Google Wave Webmasters # (I call them "Google Wavers" or just "Wavers"). # # I talked with the LEAD senior optimizer for a top 5 seo firm last summer at # a conference. We were talking about my Keyword Density Analyzer utility that # is available here for subscribers. I raised an eyebrow as he did not # understand concept of keyword density. He simply didn't know what it was and # instead wanted to talk about links. That is not the exception - that sort of # ignorance is rampant out there. There are guys and gals reading this right # now, that are top 50 seo's. There are also people you read every day as # "experts" who couldn't pass an SEO101 class. I know one seo who has written # a successful book about SEO, who I am almost positive has never done any SEO # but her/his blog. # # The majority of the SEO knowledge out there today is about links. From # services that provide linking, to sites that sell links, we have a huge # investment in "links=seo". So huge, that even long after linkage as SEO is # dead an buried, there will still be those trumpeting it as the # end-all-be-all of SEO to make coin off it. # # What happens to all those Wavers that think [i]Getting Links = SEO[/i] when # that majority of the Google algo is devalued in various ways? Wavers built # their fortunes on "links=seo". When that goes away, the Wavers have zero to # hold on to. # # All they can do - is complain. An entire generation of webmasters are forced # to go back to SEO101 and learn what they ignored or never had the fortitude # and passion to learn. # # -bt # # ...I have a friend who's a billionaire. He invented Cliff notes. # When I asked him how he got such a great idea, he said, # "Well first I.....I just....to make a long story short..." - Stephen Wright # # =========================================================================== # # # # Password Hell! # # # # by brett tabke # # 5/15/2006 # # # # =========================================================================== # # In one of the more amusing articles, I have seen in awhile, # silicon.com proposes a set of password guidelines. # While some are very useful - other are dubious - and still others humorus. # # http://www.silicon.com/research/specialreports/idmanagement/0,380001 # 1361,39158933,00.htm # My take: # # 1- Passwords must not be written down # # Yes, you must remember that autogenerated forced password like: # "71JU28kIjjL7126" by pure memory power alone. LOL! # # Fact: There is little chance of your remembering all the passwords # you are forced to use. # # Tip: Always record your passwords somewhere in some form. We'd # recommend one of the many password keeper programs that can be # locked. Or, write them down and put them in a company safe. We'd # suggest a simple encryption system such as exchanging the first or # last two characters of every password. # # # 2: Passwords must be set # # TIP: If a required secure system allows you to leave a password as a # default (such as password or admin) - then get a new system because # the current one is not secure and there is little doubt that # fundamental security flaws will be found under the skin. # # 3: Require as few passwords as possible # # FACT: You have no choices in this matter. You gotta use - what you # gotta use. # # 4: Staff must change their passwords regularly # # That is a good tip, but fred2006 will change his password to # fred2005 and flip back and forth. Most studies on this one have # shown that people simply cycle between a few default flavors. # # 5: Make new passwords new # # The only way to do that is to use a randomization routine. Which # brings us full circle back to #1. # # 6: Avoid obvious words # # Good tip. Dictionary attacks still happen. Which means most systems # should use a 3strikes and you are out for 15mins programming rule. # # 7: Think long - but not too long # # Password problems are directly proportional to the length of # passwords. As password length increases - so do support and system # help calls. # # 8: Automate password changes # # Good tip, but be sure to lay in more customer support personnel on # the days you force password changes. Sally in accounting is sure to # call with password problems. Be sure to lay in more training for # your support personnel, because as calls increase, so do social # engineering related hacker calls. # # 9: Educate staff # # Deja vu. # # 10: Look to the future such as biometrics and two-factor # authentication # # That's great - beam me up Mr. Scott. # # Fact: real world biometrics are 5-10 years away. Todays finger print # scanners have a high failure rate and are not workable in the real # world. # # The closest we have are the retinal eye scanners. They have quite a # r&d cycle to go before ready. They run as high as a 25% failure # rates right now, but the future looks very bright for them. They # might also be combine with health scanners to spot the early onset # of eye diseases. # # Warning - software plug: # I use SplashID for desktop and for my phone. Works great... # # -bt # # ... For my birthday I got a humidifier and a dehumidifier. I put # them in the same room and let them fight it out. # =========================================================================== # # # # Digging Out from Boston # # # # by brett tabke # # 5/4/2006 # # # # =========================================================================== # # Whew, finally have dug out from the onslaught of work that was Pubcon Boston. # # What a great conference it was. The blogging session was my favorite I think. # Setting in with Matt and Robert, and Jeremy was like being allowed to listen # in on a private conversation between the three of them. Funny thing was that # Robert barely made it to the conference. The cab driver took him to the wrong # convention center. # # Attendee numbers were on par with last years New Orleans conference. We really # had to fight for it thought with the proximity to Easter and the other big # conferences going on at the same time. # # Special thanks to Malcolm Gladwell for helping with charity book signing. # Together we raised nearly \$3000 for charity. # # # # Brett # # ... It doesn't matter what temperature a room is, it's always room temperature. # =========================================================================== # # # # Follow The Money # # # # by brett tabke # # 3/28/2006 # # # # =========================================================================== # # # ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo # # WebmasterWorlds PUBCON BOSTON # # Keynote by Malcolm (Tipping Point) Gladwell # # Get the PubCon Edge! # # http://www.PubCon.com # # ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo # # # When not conferencing or tweaking servers, the great state of # "newbieness" is my top "blue sky" topics to contemplate. # # I can not count the times that people have come up to me at the # conferences and said something to the effect: # # "3 months ago I was working in a factory....now I am making more # money and working much less thanks to WebmasterWorld." There are # plenty of newbie stories out there just like that. # # Remember in the 80's when everyone was waxing on about "the life # cycle" of the human? If you understood the life cycle of humans you # could make a fortune (eg: knowing to invest in fitness equipment # when the baby boomers hit 30, or in luxury cars when they hit 40, or # investment schemes when they hit 50, or retirement stuff when they # hit 60). # # I think to really understand the current state of newbieness, you # have to understand the life cycle of the web user: # # The CIA says something to the effect, "that 88% of all humans will # live 99% of their lives within 25miles of the spot they were born". # Most of us were born on Yahoo and we have not strayed to far from # the nest. Most of what we do on the web today is still filtered # through those early Yahoo colored glasses. Even Google took it's # starting low impact page que from Yahoo. # # Today, many new web users and new webmasters are being "born on # Google.com" and continue to ride the Google wave into webmastering. # Understanding the new newbie webmaster phenom is to understand the # Google wave is to understand the Newbie wave. Circular? Yes it is. # The bottom line is that it is Adsense - it is the heart and soul of # the newbie wave. I don't think we have seen anything yet. There is # an explosion of newbieness going on out there and we are just # scratching the surface here. # # -bt # # ...You want to know what is going on? Then follow the money - (Deepthroat 1973). # # =========================================================================== # # # # What is Your EQ? # # # # by brett tabke # # 3/14/2006 # # # # =========================================================================== # # # # Sorry for the delay in updating - I got tied up in this tornado of # exuberance called PubCon prep work. # # Good friend digitalghost tipped me off to a fresh business quiz. # http://www.webmasterworld.com/profile.cgi?action=view&member=digitalghost # # This one is by noted marketing guru Guy Kawasaki: # http://blog.guykawasaki.com/2006/03/whats_your_eq_e.html # # ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # Here's a quiz to determine your "entrepreneurial quotient". My # intent is to test a person's knowledge of entrepreneurship. However, # scoring high doesn't mean you're the next Steve Jobs, and scoring # low doesn't mean you're not. Some answers are debatable, so there # will be many comments. # ---------------------------------------------------------------------- # # ok - haven't taken the test just yet. I got to reading that page # and several things besides the test freaking leaped off the page and # need major comment. # # a) guy is pretty cool. We thought about him for a keynote at PubCon # and may have him in the future. I saw him speak a couple years ago # in Chicago and he is a very righteous speaker. # # # b) What is that over on the right where the traditional trashcan # blog roll should be? What is a Tag Zoom cloud? That looks brilliant! # Where have I been on that one...wow. Take your tags and dump keywords # on to the page and don't call is page spamming - call it a # Cloud! (grin)and people wonder why tagging teams are going at it? # # # c) Another Text-Link-Ads ad on that page. Patrick Gavin of TLA is # without-a-doubt this last years genius advertiser in the SEO space - # he is EVERYWHERE with his product. What and excellent job of # brand building with a sometimes controversial product. Nice Work! # # ok - back to the test... # # I missed 7. # # #4: The foundation of a successful brand is: # # I still think should be A (Effective marketing). It was a trick # question because a great product does NOT equal a great brand. But, # a bad product can equal a great brand (eg: Ipod was 2 years late to # the market, major under powered, 50% higher than competitors, and # broke alot in the early days...) # # #5: Ultimately, who positions a product or service establishing how # customers will come to view it? # # The company positions a product from start to finish. What happens # in the market place by the consumers - is not positioning. Any # company that believes the product, the message, and the positioning # is out of their control - is doomed - go home people - it's over. # You control EVERYTHING. Yes, there comes a point when every child # leaves the nest, but even then, they can phone home to get money # wired after that weekend bender at college. The point being, that # a culture of accountability, resposibilty and total empowerment # must live in the product from birth until death pulls if off the # shelf. Nothing less than a employeement force that takes total # ownership for a products life cycle is acceptable. # # #6: If you want your company to be successful, it's most important # to strive for which objective? # # Ok fine, life, liberty and the pursuit of a monopoly. # Tastes like chicken. # # ....meanwhile, back in the real world. # # Ya, i will cut Guy some slack on this one. I know where he is coming # from, however I do not believe that you HAVE to be the sole # provider of something people really want to be profitable, successful, # or even retire early. All of that can be accomplished in # a highly competitive market. # # #10: Which part of a business plan is the most important? # # Well, he warned us that it was trick question in his intro. lol. # executive summary. Have you ever seen a business plan that had an # "executive summary"? (shrug - yes I have) In lieu of that - the # competitive analysis is most important. # # #13: A company that is bootstrapping should avoid which management # practice? # # I suppose this is a little too close to home for me to see the # answer clearly. I said C (Positioning against the industry leader), # but b (Trying to recruit a "dream" management team of proven # executives) makes very good sense. Chimps can manage in the early # days and you need committed, passionate heavy lifters to lay down # the schema and carry out the existing plan as growth overwhelms you # in the early days. # # #15: You've just met with a key potential account. It could be a # large sale and also bolster your company's credibility in the # industry. However, the account is afraid to do business with a # "startup." The best way to win them over is to: # # # 15: I totally knew his answer was going to be C: Offer to do a # pilot implementation at a deep discount. # # Unfortunately, I know alot of companies that have held going out of # business sales because they said C too. Just talk to companies like # Novell, Stacker, Word Perfect, Lotus, Apple, or Geocities about # showing people a "demo" at a deep discount. Never heard of some of # those companies? Ya, they all are about dead or suffered extreme harm # at some point, because they happened to give people deeply discounted # demos. There is no better way in todays world to get your product # ripped off than to give discounted demo. Where would Apple be today # if Steve Jobs hadn't given a mac demo to Microsoft and went with # some other software house? # # # - BT # =========================================================================== # # # # The Left and the Right Wing Assault Four Big Horses # # # # by brett tabke # # 2/15/2006 # # # # =========================================================================== # # # ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo # # WebmasterWorlds PUBCON BOSTON # # Keynote by Malcolm (Tipping Point) Gladwell # # Get the PubCon Edge! # # http://www.PubCon.com # # ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo # # If you happened to watch todays hearings that featured Google, Yahoo, # Cisco, and Microsoft you saw a double sided ambush. These are some folks # worried about their congressional seat in an election year. These # are same lot who voted for open and free trade with China. Yes, this is # the same lot that is now waxing poetic and pointed accusatory fingers at # the big four for doing what we do - making money in the market place # that our government and lawmakers created by granting China, most favored # trade status. # # The message underneath is pretty clear : "as long as it political # prisoners working for 50cents a day to build designer tennis shoes # for Walmart in Shanghai - it is ok. But once it is "in your face" with # flat out censorship - it is not ok! There is zero difference between # that guy building Nikes for Walmart and Google selling the keyword # "great wall". # # Dear Washington; # # Get over it, or change your damnable trade laws THAT YOU MADE. # Leave the internet alone. It is too big and complex for you to # understand. Let the boys in California do business and quit trying # to make political capital out of a less than ideal situation. It is # not up to the Four Horsemen to fight our national battles or more # precisely - the battles you don't have the nads to fight where you # should be fighting. If you have a problem with the way China is # doing business, then take it up in Beijing. # # Brett Tabke ## # =========================================================================== # # # # Head Down and Spending Time With The Cube # # # # by brett tabke # # 2/14/2006 # # # # =========================================================================== # # First, happy Valentines day in the US. I have spent the better # part of the last few weeks - locked in combat with "the cube". Yes, # it is coming up on conference time (www.pubcon.com) and I am busy # finishing the session grid. I have always likened it to solving a a # rubics cube. XX number of Sessions with XX number of speakers with # XX number of egos ;-) makes for a fun challenge. The good news is - # the grid is almost done! Best conference ever. # # -bt # =========================================================================== # # # # The Richter Scale of Conferencing # # # # by brett tabke # # 2/1/2006 # # # # =========================================================================== # # # ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo # # WebmasterWorlds PUBCON BOSTON # # Keynote by Malcolm (Tipping Point) Gladwell # # Get the PubCon Edge! # # http://www.PubCon.com # # ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo # # post note: Did I just become the first one to ever put a banner ad in a robots.txt? # # re:http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2006/01/29/exploding-the-conference-business/ # # Last week Jeff Jarvis (buzzmachine - one of my 'gotta reads') talked # about conferences in a blog post. His sentiments have echoed many I # have heard. Scoble addressed many of Jeffs comments, but even Robert # was a bit conservative in his estimates of what a conference # costs these days. # # http://scobleizer.wordpress.com/2006/01/29/conferences-vcing-hot-topics-this-morning/ # # 2000 of My Closest Friends for 3 Days: # # Lets say you are going to plan a conference for 2000 people for 3 # days. To hold a conference that size, you are going to be pretty # limited in what venues you can use. Those that will work - will cost # you. If you are in a hotel, your rates will go down, but in a # convention center they can increase significantly. At a minimum, you # will pay about \$1 a square foot. Or, a conference of 2k for 3 days, # will run \$50,000 to \$80,000 for the space. # # Next, a you will need a contractor to handle the conference setup, # and to work with the venue. Most cities and convention centers # require union labor to handle things like booths. That will run you # another \$20k-\$50k. # # You will need some AV. You can do it for about \$10k on the cheap, or # \$20-\$30k if you wanna be real. # # Then you'll need security as mandated by the venue. About \$5-7k. # # Then some labor to operate the thing. Another \$10-15k. # # Conference books. About \$10-15 per attendee (\$20-\$25k). # # Shipping all this stuff - another \$5-20k (it gets out of control in # a hurry). # # Figuring out how to get all this to sync - atleast \$10k in # consultants (very conservative). # # Computers to manage your registration on site and for presentations # \$5k. # # On venue site misc expenses (trust me) \$10-20k. # # Hey, you want internet at your conference? That will run \$500 to # \$1000 PER connection! (or \$8k easy) # # You want a big shot keynote speaker? Figure \$40-\$150k speaking fees # (plus expenses). # # Showing your panel speakers some love : \$2k - xx,000 # # Then your online site \$7-10k a year. # # You gotta have some of them there perty signs to tell everyone # what's where when - \$2k on the cheap - \$5k to get real. # # Then your guys to build and run the conference (1 person per 500 # attendees min) at probably 70k-90k a year. # # You need to get your people there right? Lets say \$20k in planes, # trains, taxis, and hotels. # # Who is that over there? Billy Joe Jim Bob Name tags: \$3 each. (\$5k) # # Taxes, insurance, offices, phones, internet - oh no!. \$xx,xxx - # \$xxx,xxx per year. # # Decorators? Don't even go there! \$20k just for designs. # # Meeting planners? \$10k just for the coffe talk. -$30-\$50k for them to # actually do some work. # # Still with us? Ok, here is where we shake out the men from the boys: # # Getting a hotel for the conference? Lets say you reserve a room # block of 750 rooms for 3 nights : 2250 times at say \$159 a night. # That's a cool \$380,000 you just guaranteed bucko. You still have the # stomach for this? What's more? you are probably going to have to # make that commitment 1 full year out before the conference! Hello!? # # Oh wait - we were doing for 2k people right? And they will be there for # the 3 nights of the conference plus the travel day. So that is 8000 # room nights and you will probably spend \$180-\$225 for rooms. So a # real figure closeer to \$1.25- to \$1.8 million. Yes, that is MILLION! # # Next you'll need to feed some people. Most conference centers will # run about \$50 per person per day for a continental breakfast and box # lunch package. Or for a three day conference, \$150 per attendee. Any # where from \$300k to \$500k for food total. If you get shmancy fancy, # you could easily top \$150 per person per day. # # Hey, so you are out of pocket for half a million to one million on this # "little conference" and committed to several hundred more - you # best be doing some marketing. add \$50-\$150k. # # Happy Fun Thoughts: # # As scary as that may be - lets think some happy thoughts and talk # revenue baby: # # In order to build a conference of 2k, you will end up comp'ing about # 25%. Those will include staff, speakers, friends, friends of # speakers, and VIP's. Every conference I have been around has a comp # rate of 25% or higher. # # Then you will have deeply discounted rates for exhibitors and # sponsors. If you have 50 exhibitors, you can figure on giving each # 4-6 passes to go along with their package. # # Next, you will more-than-likely have a discount rate for exhibit # hall only attendees. That will run another 10-20% depending on your # conference style and attraction. Of that, you will probably have a # discounted coupon rate for your exhibitors. I know of one large # conference that regularly gives exhibitors a 50% discount rate that # they can pass on to their clients. # # Then you will probably have a deeply discounted early sign up rate. # # Lastly, many conferences will have single "day rates" that cut # prices in half for each day. # # So here is the big secret in conferences today - at a minimum, a # modern conference of 2k will have less than 50% that actually pay to # get in the door, and of those - only 30-35% will pay full price. For # example, I know of one big new york conference that had 8k people # attend last year. Of those, only 555 were paid in full, 1500 were # single day passes and the rest were exhibit hall only and comps. # # Exhibits? Ya, those will require special handling. Rarely do # conferences sell packages at full price. Even the largest # conferences out there today often discount their sponsorships 50% # for multi conference signups. # # So, as Scoble hints, it is exponentially harder to do a conference # of 2k than it is to do a conference of 4-5 hundred. It is like that # Richter scale thing where things start multiplying out of control. # # Our Orlando conference of 500 in Feb of 2004 was 7000% more # profitable than our Las Vegas conference of 1500 last fall. # # I think 2006 will be a big year of shake out in the conference # business. We will see many smaller conferences fade and the bigger # ones solidify their standing. The Fad-Techs and the CES's will grow # in dominance. What will separate the big from the small will be # marketing. # # Does Alan Meckler selling Ses makes a whole lot more sense now? # Alan will not be missed (atleast by those of us that run # conferences...lol) # # Jeff did have some very interesting comments about a conference being # a conversation, we will tackle those another day. # # BT # # =========================================================================== # # # # Cache This - Or, Setting Up Your Own Vertical Search Engine # # # # by brett tabke # # 1/27/2006 # # # # =========================================================================== # # # http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum30/32936.htm # # http://www.eff.org/news/archives/2006_01.php#004345 # # I've said for years that in any court case, "the one with the most # money will 99% of the time win. Yesterdays ruling that Googles # republished copy of pages (they call it a "cache") proves that # point. # # What Does It Mean: # # It means we can now all start "caching" search engines and # republishing works. Simply download and install a search engine # just as ASPSeek and fed it some URLs. And as added bonus points # The search engines will glady cache your cached pages. # # http://www.aspseek.org # # - bt # # =========================================================================== # # # # Another Search Magazine # # # # by brett tabke # # 1/26/2006 # # # # =========================================================================== # # # The third attempt at a search marketing magazine: # # http://www.searchmarketingstandard.com/ # # Many will probably remember the first big magazine BallyHoo by Troy # Perkins. # # -bt # =========================================================================== # # # # Yahoo, Oh Sorry - She Said it, but We Didn't Mean It! # # # # by brett tabke # # 1/25/2006 # # # # =========================================================================== # # # http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum35/3819.htm# # # Yahoo CFO Susan Dreker said earlier this week: # # http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/business/256748_yahoo24.html # ----------------------------------------------------------------------- # "We don't think it's reasonable to assume we're going to gain a lot # of share from Google," Chief Financial Officer Susan Decker said in # an interview. "It's not our goal to be No. 1 in Internet search. We # would be very happy to maintain our market share." # ----------------------------------------------------------------------- # # So when my email and stickymail started going off that Yahoo had # responded, I was excited. At least until I found out they had # responded on their blog. # # They have the phone number of every major tech reporter in the # country in their Rolodex. So why not call up Bloomberg for a second # interview and respond - or how about the AP - or the New York Times, # - one of a dozen other top news outlets in the country? To publish # a "nondenial denial" on the corporate blog is to be dismissed from # top to bottom. It pollutes everything they have to say via that # avenue from now until eternity # # This is a perfect example of why the corporate search blogs # should be ignored. It is why companies should not act this way. # It is also why we do not link to corporate search blogs. # # If they have something to say - then issue a press release, or # grab the nearest real reporter on any street corner and talk. # # - bt # # =========================================================================== # # # # Google to Cofund a AntiSpyware Group # # # # by brett tabke # # 1/25/2006 # # # # =========================================================================== # # # # The Google toolbar tracks everthing a person does with his/her browser. # # Google knows the following about toolbar users: # # - searches they performed on Google. # - what url they click on. # - time they spend on each site. # # A massive set of derived data: # - forms they filled out (not actual values). # - purchasing actions. # - blog entries. # - chat rooms and groups entered. # - what advertisements they viewed. # - competitors urls. # - private and https urls unseen to GoogleBot. # # This is what the web referrs to as spyware. If a user enables the # tracking mode advanced features of the toolbar (every toolbar I have # seen has it on), the above info is tracked forever by Google. # # That by itself is benign. It is when you put it in the context of # the US governments request for information from Google that things # get very suspect. # # http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/01/24/google_privacy_poll/ # ------------------------------------------------------------------------- # More than three quarters of web surfers don't realize Google records # and stores information that may identify them, results of a new # opinion poll show. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------- # # http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum86/4413.htm # # So from out of no where comes word that Google will cofund a group # that is AntiSpyware. # # http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1895,1915114,00.asp # ------------------------------------------------------------------------- # Sources say the Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law # School will run the operations of the coalition with help from # Consumer Reports WebWatch, a consumer advocacy group. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------- # # Ya buddy - Harvard involved in it! Lets to those college boys on the case. # After all - they have a ton of leisure time and think they have the world # by the tail. Now maybe we can get some decent legal action on Malware! # # However, from there - we go down hill pretty fast: # # ------------------------------------------------------------------------- # Vint Cerf, the renowned technologist who was recently hired as chief # Internet evangelist at Google, is on board as an adviser to the # coalition. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------- # # Can you say "conflict of interest"? This is an attempt at co-opting an # isssue that is right in their front yard. # # And from there - it flat out gets shaddy: # # The groups domain? # Umm, dude - it is owned by Google... # ------------------------------------------------------------------------- # Domain ID:D109507546-LROR # Domain Name:STOPBADWARE.ORG # Created On:14-Dec-2005 01:04:00 UTC # Last Updated On:19-Jan-2006 21:11:56 UTC # Expiration Date:14-Dec-2006 01:04:00 UTC # Sponsoring Registrar:Network Solutions LLC (R63-LROR) # Status:CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED # Registrant ID:40225598-NSIV # Registrant Name:Google # Registrant Organization:Google # ------------------------------------------------------------------------- # # And just when I was feeling all Googly about Google again... # # http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum86/4412.htm # # -bt # # =========================================================================== # # # # Google China - Seeds of Revolution # # # # by brett tabke # # 1/25/2006 # # # # =========================================================================== # # # Revolutions do not happen when things get worse, or human rights are # walked on. People have better times fresh in their memory. They are # willing to endure some hard times because they feel blessed about the # average or good times they just had. # # Historically, revolutions happen when things start to get "a little bit # better". People start to want, hope, and dream of a better future. That # desire - often along with an empty stomach - moves them to action. # # Not the US Government - nor US companies - are going to single handedly # start a revolution in China. Only the Chinese can do that if they desire. # Hopefully, the taste of a little Google brand of information freedom # can help things get a "little bit better" in China. # # From blood stained concret of Tiananmen Square, to the factories of # Shanghi, there is a fire in the belly of China. Google in China is # not a seed of freedom. Google is potent fuel to the fire. # # As distasteful as many of us find government imposed censorship, # Google did the right thing. It is better to be part of an imperfect # solution, than to be part of the problem. Lets us hope, the quest for # freedom continues to grow. # # What exactly will be censored? www.google.cn # # -bt # # =========================================================================== # # # # Windows Install and Active X - They Still Bite the Big One # # # # AKA, How I Learned to Stop Whinning about AdWare and Love Gator # # # # by brett tabke # # 1/24/2006 # # # # =========================================================================== # # # # The Sacrificial Machine: # # We had a machine at work for awhile that we would install suspect software # on it and let it have its way with the machine. We used to run an mp3 site # for mp3 software and that stuff would often come with AdWare and spyware as # tag alone installs. It was always scary to fire up the sacrificial machine # and look at WebmasterWorld. Via popware and AdWare, we watched benign text # get churned into some ones (often a competitors) advertisement. It was # unnerving and infuriating. It is an over used word, but I did feel # "violated" for my site and my community. It was as if someone was stealing # from us in broad daylight and the cops wouldn't do anything to protect # our property. # # Internet Explorer - And Microsoft ActiveX: # # On the way to "web is platform" nerdvana, Microsoft ran into a few problems. # The first of those problems was Active X. Aside from making for some great # viruses, ActiveX has done little to live up to the hype. It is so overly # complex, that only major corporations with deep programming departments and # hackers can write programs to take advantage of it. As far as I can # determine, the only real purpose ActiveX has thus far live out, has been to # leave systems vulnerable to easy attack. Although the Microsoft security # patches have fallen from a weekly occurrence to a monthly one (thank God!), # there are still many holes being found in Windows. Any operating system # that could allow a Gator to be installed and not easily uninstalled without # heroic measures is fundamentally flawed. # # It was via many of the ActiveX access points, that AdWare programs have # found a living. It was through those points, that they were able to quietly # be installed. I am sure we have all seen the reports that some of the # AdWare programs used questionable install methods and ethics. Whether that # includes Gator (now known as Claria), I do not know. # # http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/13.12/spyware.html # # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ # "Our idea was a program that would store your passwords and automatically # log you into password-protected sites," says Wally Buch. ...They called it # eWallet. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ # # Respecting Innovation: # # I love software innovation in any sector. Take Claria/Gator for example. It # started out as a simple little program that would act as a "wallet" for # people to securely and easily spend money online. It was morphed into an # amazing (but annoying) Ad program. I say amazing, because some of the things # going on at the code level in Claria are break through tactics. Some of # which, you can clearly see showing up in other major ad programs. Gator was # the original contextual ad program that silently fed ads that worked along # side webpages. # # The Scumware Nonsense: # # I was fundamentally against the webmaster stance that there was something # inherently wrong with Gator. I believe strongly that Claria/Gator is one of # the most innovative products of the last five years. AdSense and its clones # would not exist if not for Gator. More than anything else, Gator points out # the gapping holes in Microsoft Windows. It also pointed out the holes in our # installation routines. Will we ever again blindly click on that agree button # to install software? For that wakeup call, we owe them a debt of gratitude # for teaching us all to question that program we are about to install. # # # http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/13.12/spyware.html # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ # Google - with its interconnected search, email, chat, blogs, and social # networks - is also in the business of targeting ads based on user behavior. # So are MSN and Yahoo! All three maintain profiles of everyone who signs up # for their services. They use cookies to track what visitors do on their # sites while they're logged in; the downloadable Google and MSN toolbars # track which sites users visit when they're logged out. Like Claria, Google # has amassed a vast database of user profiles that it plans to use for even # better targeting in the future. # ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ # # On side note, I also respect Claria for it's tough stance and business # tenacity. They have taken a tired, beaten, and bruised company and turned it # into a company that works with some of the largest companies on the web # today. I think they will be used in public relations courses as text book # examples of proactive damage control and campaign management. # # It is doubtful I will ever learn to "love" Claria. However, the one public # service it has done is to show us where to truly point a finger of blame - # straight at Redmond for giving us an OS that would allow AdWare to make a # living in the first place. # # - bt # =========================================================================== # # # # Gladwell Sells Movie Rights to Blink # # by brett tabke # # 1/23/2006 # # # # =========================================================================== # # # On the day last November that we booked Gladwell to speak at # this springs PubCon Boston, he sold the movie rights to Blink. # # http://film.guardian.co.uk/news/story/0,12589,1639421,00.html # # ------------------------------------------------------------------------ # Leonardo DiCaprio is to play a man with a particular gift for # reading body language in the forthcoming adaptation of Blink, # Malcolm Gladwell's bestseller about how people make snap decisions. # The writer-director will be Stephen Gaghan, who won an Oscar for his # screenplay of 2000's drug trade film Traffic. "[Gaghan] came to me # out of the blue," Gladwell told trade magazine Variety. 'He thought # there was something in the book that was a movie. We took one # chapter from the book and fashioned a story out of it. But most of # it is something we dreamt up together." # ------------------------------------------------------------------------ # # bt # # =========================================================================== # # # # Warren Buffet Buys BusinessWire # # by brett tabke # # 1/22/2006 # # # # =========================================================================== # # # We all quietly missed a major story last week: # Berkshire Hathaway to Buy Business Wire # # http://www.wtopnews.com/?nid=111&sid=673683 # # That is Warrens first buy in internet space. # # -bt # # =========================================================================== # # # # Google The Liberal - Google to Decide Next US President? # # by brett tabke # # 1/20/2006 # # # # =========================================================================== # # # The Beast: # # And so it begins; the politics of personal destruction turns its' # malcontented eyes upon warm and fuzzy Google. "The Beast" always needs # to be fed. # # Bush and the right wing have all by dominated the DC news cycle for the last # 6 years. Wrong doing at the highest levels of govt - from suspect actions of # the vice president, to questionable activities of the NSA, The Beast has not # has a satisfying orgy since Lewinsky and Clinton left town. Even Jacko # couldn't keep The Beast contented for long. # # Google The Blue State: # # CNN reported last year on a USA Today campaign finance analysis of the 2004 # election. The story at the time was a page three nerf story that didn't # cause any concern or discussion at the time. The story maintained that 98% # of all Google employee contributions went to Democrats in 2004. # # http://money.cnn.com/2005/02/14/technology/google_democrats/?section=cnn_allpolitics # # -------------------------------------------------------------- # A USA Today campaign finance analysis found that, of the # company's overall political contributions, 98 percent went # to Democrats, the biggest share among top tech donors. # -------------------------------------------------------------- # # That story is about the 2004 election. Since that time, Google has went # public and grown significantly. Google employee net worth has grown by # several BILLION dollars. # # So, lets cut to the chase : if Google employees are very generous with their # campaign contributions, they could almost fund the entire democratic # presidential campaign alone. At a minimum, they could be the difference in a # close election. # # Think that is a stretch? Imagine what a 1-2 million dollars worth of # public service announcements educating people about "chads" could have done # in Florida in 2000. What about a 5-10 million dollar ad buy in Cleveland or # Pittsburgh in Oct of 2004? Google contributions could have easily swayed the # last two presidential elections the other way! # # http://www.usatoday.com/money/industries/technology/2005-02-13-google-give-usat_x.htm # # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- # Top Google givers last year included CEO Eric Schmidt, whose company stock # is worth about \$2.8 billion. His biggest donation: \$25,000 to the Democratic # Congressional Campaign Committee. His was among several big employee # contributions made shortly after Google's IPO. # ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- # # Pre-emptive Pacification Program: # # When Bill Gates had a similar political problem in 1999, he went on a right # wing pacification program. It included lobbyists, massive political # contributions, and speeches aimed at propping up the right wing platform. In # return, the Bush administration took the harsh sentence imposed by Clinton # dominated courts and morphed it into a hand slap. # # http://www.lightreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=82105 # ------------------------------------------------------------------ # Our mission in Washington boils down to this: Defend the Internet # as a free and open platform for information, communication and # innovation, writes Google attorney Andrew McLaughlin. # ------------------------------------------------------------------ # # At a minimum, I think we will see Republicans marching to Mountain View with # their hands out repeatedly. Will Larry and Sergey "share the love"? # # The only question is if Google will be able to survive their ride on The # Beast? Yesterday, Google lost \$50 off it's stock value. The biggest one day # decline for Google ever - and that was but a simple subpoena issue. Imagine # what a real "issue day" for the beast will be. # # What happened this week was not a country seeking data from Google - it was # the first salvo of the 2008 presidential election. This was target practice # from The Beast. # # This week was your only wake up call Google. The politics of personal # destruction are knocking at the door. Heads up Larry and Sergey, # The Beast is coming. # # -bt # # =========================================================================== # # # # Open House # # by brett tabke # # 1/19/2006 # # # # =========================================================================== # # # Thanks to everyone who made it to the open house at our new offices yesterday. # We had a great time. Thanks to RogerD and LifeTips for the flowers. # # http://www.pubcon.com/t/t.htm # # -bt # =========================================================================== # # # # Web 2.0 # # by brett tabke # # 1/13/2006 # # # # =========================================================================== # # # Happy Friday the 13th. # # Lets boil the entire Web 2.0 noise down into a simple sentence: # # The total spamification of Usenet, meant people # had to go somewhere else to communicate. # # That is all that is at work in all the 2.0 talks, papers, # research, and general huff-n-puff that is going on. People love to # talk. Mankind has taken every opportunity in history to communicate: # # - stone tablet # - runners, horses, carrier pigeons # - flag tower to flag tower # - smoke signals # - quill pen and parchment paper, corn husks. # - books, flyers, newspapers # - telegraph # - radio # - phone # - television # - computer to computer # - internet # # Any time something has interfered with any of those lines of # communication, there was a break through, or a movement to a new # type of communication. In the case of the internet, that is people # moving from the public spam fest known as Usenet, to privately # controlled entities such as bbs's and social networking sites. Spam is # at the root of the Usenet decline. From body part enlargement ads, to # carefully constructed whisper campaigns, people got tired of # fighting it the same way we got tired of fighting it in our inboxes. # # From there, came this onslaught of irrelevant stuff from web-is-platform # to, "a new way to communicate" piled on. None of which had anything # whatsoever to do with "Web 2.0" as was originally envisioned. # # So lets stop pontificating about Web 2.0 and tell the truth - Usenet # is dying, and Tim Oreilly needs to make a buck! # # Everything else you have heard about Web 2.0 is just bs to fill # dead air time. # # -bt # # ... The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese. # # =========================================================================== # # # # The Banner Buster Grows Up # # by brett tabke # # 1/12/2006 # # # # =========================================================================== # # # # This one should be filed under that old "hate it as a user - love it # as a webmaster" file folder. # # As webmasters, most of our sites life blood is advertising. As # webmasters we enjoy getting those checks every month, but as users, # we all kinda wince at some of the over kill out there on the web # today. # # From about 1998 until 2003, there was a pretty strong anti # advertising component on the web. A flashing banner ad would send # alot of users into a web rage. That trend was watered down as banner # advertising went bust. I also think it went bust because some search # engines started to devalue pages with banner ads on them. Whether # that was done because it was competition, or because users clearly # didn't want those types of pages is an argument for another day. # # http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum89/10863.htm # # Since the rebirth of advertising lead by Googles AdSense program, # the trend has been back towards advertising and webmasters. The # non offensive benign text based ads are rather harmless. However, # with the rise of AdSense, there has been the slow rebirth of # graphical based ads and buttons. What webmaster hasn't wanted to # maximize his or her revenue and ad inventory? # # Based on the continuing rise in the number of threads dealing with # web spam, it is clear users are once again getting annoyed by the # growing onslaught of visual noise. The blog entry we did here a few # weeks ago about web spam generated a large vocal response from # members. It was equally split between "love" and "hate". By far, # the largest set of feedback was about ad blockers and how easy it is # for people to cut 75% of the web junk off their machine. Having not # looked at Ad blockers for a few years, I was amazed at the depth and # quality of software available for this specific task. # # http://www.pcworld.com/downloads/browse/0,cat,1448,sortIdx,1,00.asp # # From simple ad blockers to users self editing their hosts file, Ad # blocking is back - as big as ever. The raw category niches that the # Ad Blockers have addressed is comprehensive: # # - Popup blockers # - Spyware blockers # - Adware blockers # - Text Advertising blockers (Google, Yahoo...etc) # - Instant Message ad blockers # - Flash blockers # - Banner blockers # - Browser based blockers # - Affiliate program blockers # - Keyword site blockers # - Proxy based ad filter services # - Interstitial stoppers # # It is scary to think of as a webmaster, that those kinds of utils # are available to the public to stop our income. We used to only have # to look at a couple of issues, but now - it seems this stuff is # growing like wildfire and the anti advertising voices are rising # again. # # I don't know if there is an action item here, other than to be aware # there is a limit to advertising on ones pages. We can't let another # antiadvertising trend get started. # # -bt # # ... For my birthday I got a humidifier and a dehumidifier. I put # them in the same room and let them fight it out. - Steven Wright # # # =========================================================================== # # # # 2006, The Year of the Independent Webmaster!? # # by brett tabke # # 1/12/2006 # # # # =========================================================================== # # # There is something going on here: # # So, How Does One Retire From This Business: # http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum78/10455.htm # # What Did You Learn This Year? # http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum78/10365.htm # # What Would Your Family Do If You Were Hit By A Bus? # http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum89/11226.htm # # Goals For 2006? A Look Ahead: # http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum78/10460.htm # # Inspiration To Get Involved In Web Development: # http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum48/2649.htm # # Building A "simple" Hobby Website, 25 Things To Figure Out: # http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum48/2635.htm # # The Question Every Webmaster Dreads: "What do you do for a living? # http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum89/11333.htm # # It is time to tune into it. We'll use this esoteric entry as a # bookmark and come back to this in about six months. # # I think this is our year. # # Mom and Pop - We're BACK!? # # -bt # # =========================================================================== # # # # WebmasterWorld Open House # # by brett tabke # # 1/12/2006 # # # # =========================================================================== # # # The WebmasterWorld community and the public are invited to a # reception to celebrate the opening of the new WebmasterWorld # Corporate Offices. # # In attendance will be Brett Tabke (CEO), Neil Marshall (Director of # Forum operations), Monica Rowley (VP Biz Operations), Matthew Olguin # (Director of PubCon Conferences), Adam Young (Lead Systems # Developer), and Joe Morin (Director of Strategic Marketing). # # The reception will take place next Wednesday January 18th from 3pm # to 7pm at our Austin Texas location. # # RSVP for directions to btabke at webmasterworld.com. # # More on new offices: # http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum19/3049.htm # # - brett # =========================================================================== # # # # Windows Update Alert # # by brett tabke # # 1/11/2006 # # # # =========================================================================== # # # Another fresh (Tuesday 11, 2006) patch for windows: # # http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2006/01/11/ms_january_patch_tuesday/ # # Update that windows please...again. # # bt # # =========================================================================== # # # # An Open letter to Jacob Nielsen # # by brett tabke # # 1/10/2006 # # # # =========================================================================== # # # re: http://www.useit.com/alertbox/search_engines.html # # Dear Mr. Neilsen: # # I apologize for losing the faith. I had gotten sucked into the mind # set that you were a bit out of touch with web realty lately. Just # when I had found comfort in that wayward thinking, you come back # with with of your most insightful and "dead solid center" articles # I have ever seen from such a well known web guru as yourself. It # not only took a quantum leap of insight to come to the conclusions # you made in this latest column, it was also - BRAVE. # # You see, for about 9 years, we have being standing on the position # that there must be life after the engines. That the engines were just the # onramp to your site and that your site must stand on it's own two legs # at some point. In order to make that happen, an alternative method of # promotion must be at work. We came up with a list of alternative # traffic sources: # # http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum10/906.htm # # We stumbled into a test in November as a result of the every widening # and ever-deeping issue of problem robots. Like SiliconValley, we have # had an ongoing issue with rogue robots and site scrapers: # # http://www.siliconvalleywatcher.com/mt/archives/2005/10/the_lie_of_dist.php # # We have also had a long time desire to see if we could live without # the low roi search traffic. Those two desires ran into each other # in November. # # http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum9/9593.htm # # To partly test out the theory that a community site could liberate # itself from search engine dependence (and the every annoying rogue # bots), we tried a test in November. We experimented with turning off # the bots/search engines and requiring cookie support from all # visitor (hens: # # http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum9/9618.htm # # We found many interesting things out during that time. Banning the # 'bots', was the most enjoyable thing I think I have done in 10 years # of web work: # # - the server was faster, # - there were fewer scraped copies of the site out there, # - less spam and we had fewer problems with members, # - the quality of posting went up, # - we used less bandwidth. # # All-n-all, it was highly successful in those regards and # business wise it was positive too. # # Unfortunately, the engines provide us with one service that we have # been unable to match: a quality site search. Having been through # every major public and private site search engine, it is clear there # is a lack of quality site search engines out there for ultra large # (2 million+ pages) sites. So, we had to flip back on selected engines # and stop requiring cookies. # # It is nice to know we can clearly live without them. Ultimately, it # has made us refocus on those top alternative traffic sources # from the engines. # # Aside from the fact your article mixed apples and oranges (paid # advertising and search), you brought up some excellent points. # # This all leads me to a challenge Jacob, and that is, to block the # search engines for 90 days to Useit.com and report your findings. # As they say -- No guts, No Glory. # # Brett Tabke # # # ... Hermits have no peer pressure. - Stephen Wright # =========================================================================== # # # # Blogging Today : Please Stand By # # by brett tabke # # 1/4/2006 # # # # =========================================================================== # # Bob is reporting on his blog, that Chris says on his blog, that he # over heard a conversation between Barry, Bob, Darren, and Fred that # said Greg read Matts blog about a blog by a guy at Google who used # to work at Microsoft who reported on his blog that Bill Gates might # say something later today. You heard it here first folks! # # please note, that we were tipped off on this story by George and # his personal blog about Spot his dog. # # ...Hey, it's no dumber than the blog aggregators about blog aggregators. # # There you have it - a perfect text book example of satire. # # Seriously - hasn't a great deal of blogging become redundant? Seriously - # hasn't a great deal of blogging become redundant? # # -bt # # =========================================================================== # # # # Diogenes with a Browser - Looking for an Honest Link # # by brett tabke # # 1/4/2006 # # # # =========================================================================== # # # Remember "Punch The Monkey"? Oh how I loved to punch that flashing, # annoying, seizure inducing ad! I would imagine it was actually the graphic # designer who came up with that ad on the receiving end of the punch. # There isn't much I hate in life, but I hate annoying web page spam! # # A definition: Web Spam # # So much graphical and textual noise that you can't determine # whether you are clicking on a paid advertisement or an actual # old-fashioned honest link. When ads are so thick, that you must # study the page carefully to determine where the content is at. # # There is a point where ads become so pervasive, that they over power # the content and hurt the credibility of a site. If you have a authoritarian # site, then that point is much higher than most would believe. I know of one # site that has over 25 ads on the page right now and is still considered a # top site in it's field. Other lesser sites, we wouldn't give two seconds # to in order to find our content. # # Whatever the level, I think we can all agree that web spam quietly took a # huge jump last year. To the point, that I have stopped visiting some regular # sites because the ads are so thick. # # Pet Peeve #2: links that are not underlined. 'nuff said. # # -bt # # ... I have an answering machine in my car. It says, "I'm home now, but # leave a message and I'll call when I'm out." - Stephen Wright # # =========================================================================== # # # # In Search of Larry Page # # by brett tabke # # 1/3/2006 # # # # =========================================================================== # # # I have had a strange running bet with an old SEO friend of mine. I bet him # \$50, that the person known as Larry Page does not actually exist. That he # was just a figment of Sergeys fertile imagination. # # Ever notice that Larry rarely talks? Or that the only time we see him is # on TV? hmmm. LOL - I really just caulk it up to Larry and Sergey doing their # best Penn and Teller bit. (teller never talks) # http://www.pennandteller.com/ # # I guess we find out Friday in Vegas as Larry is scheduled to talk at the # CES show. As far as I know, this is Larrys first big tech conference # speech. Up-to-now, Sergey has always been the spokesmen for the dynamic duo. # # I just read down my rss aggregator list. Of the top 50 stories, Google is # mentioned in 41 of them. Wow! # # Saturation. What will Google do? Is it any wonder that they have had Larry # and Sergey in the proverbial mayonnaise jar on the front porch of Funk & # Wagnalls since August of 2004? # # Dear Mrs Google; Can Larry and Sergey come out and play? # # -bt # # post note: 1/7/2006: due to a family matter that came up, I was unable # to get to Vegas to see Larrys Keynote at CES. Special thanks to GoogleGuy, # and Google PR for your efforts to get me tickets. -bt # # =========================================================================== # # # # 2005 The Year The World Learned to Love/Hate The Blog # # by brett tabke # # 1/2/2006 # # # # =========================================================================== # # # Forbes called it, "Attack of the Blogs". # # http://www.forbes.com/home/free_forbes/2005/1114/128.html # # Forbes Writes: # -------------------------------------------------------------------- # " Web logs are the prized platform of an online lynch mob # spouting liberty but spewing lies, libel and invective. # Their potent allies in this pursuit include Google and Yahoo." # -------------------------------------------------------------------- # # At first glance I wrote this all off to a "refer madness" like scare mongering # by someone who got vetted or outted by a blog. The allegations are so strong # that I am outraged that Forbes could publish something so transparently # vindictive against an alternative publishing medium. I really thought this # was another case of a competitor fearing the loss of it's personal power # platform. After all, if blogs give us what we need, then who needs a forest # killing dinosaur like Forbes magazine? # # I read, reread, and even posted about the article published by Forbes. # Then something weird happened - my thinking took one of those nerve rattling # fundamental shifts. # # Have you ever found yourself suddenly on the other side of a very popular # issue? You feel a little bit diseased - like there is something wrong with # you for thinking it? I bet Newton felt that way when he told the world # that the earth revolved around the sun. # # You see, I tried and tried to find some truth to the Forbes statement. # Other than a couple of isolated incidents, surely blogs are not a # "online lynch mob". # # Then I remembered one of the simplest declarations I have ever heard about # blogs. It sparked a heated debate about the freedom of speech and the internet. # It came from a Wall Street Journal article that ended up on /. a few months ago: # # ----------------------------------------------------------- # "The Internet is not your personal stump to beat up people" # ----------------------------------------------------------- # http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/08/31/1427228&tid=123 # # Just as I was throwing that quote into Google to see what popped up # - it hit me that the statement was said in a story in our very own # space. It was a story about search, forums, SEO, and blogs - it was # the Traffic-Power story. This wasn't an abstract statement about our # space by some New York publisher trying to protect his falling # margins - this was about - and by - US. # # No matter what you feel or have read about the Traffic Power story, # I think it is suffice to say that there was a bit of an "all out # pile on" action. I really don't have an opinion about the whole # story myself. This is one we need to let the courts work through. # # The fact that this type of incident could occur in our space, pretty # much proves Forbes general premise that blogs can and do hurt people # some of the time. It also proves my point to judge your information # sources very carefully. # # -bt # # ..."Everywhere is walking distance if you have the time." - Stephen Wright # # =========================================================================== # # # # Om Worries About Content Rippers # # by brett tabke # # 12/27/2005 # # # # =========================================================================== # # re: http://gigaom.com/2005/12/25/wholesale-blog-plagiarism-alert/ # # Wholesale site ripping has been going on for ages. Site theft is # one of the top problems on the web today. It just goes to show you, # that many of the "top guys", are still newbies in our space. # # more here: http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum9/9618.htm # # =========================================================================== # # # # Merry Xmas # # by brett tabke # # 12/22/2005 # # # # =========================================================================== # # # What a year it has been! # # I hope you have a great holiday. # # Merry Christmas from everyone at WebmasterWorld. # # Brett # # ... Historical footnote: webmasterworld ranked #1 for the keyword # webmaster today on google. A fun warm-n-fuzzy for a 700 million results # search - but thats about all. The kw is poor performer. # =========================================================================== # # # # The New Content Rich Face of SEO # # by brett tabke # # 12/20/2005 # # # # =========================================================================== # # # We were talking about the 101 Signals of Quality Series we have # started in the supporters forum. Some questions came up if we were # going to ban SE Reps from the thread. I laughed and thought it newbish. # Here's why. # # http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum78/10348.htm # # Todays seo is about content, content, content, and - at best - how to arrange it. # GG is the first one to give up tips on how to structure content. # Both for crawability purposes and rankings purposes. If you have # fresh, quality, regularly updated content - Google and GG will be # the first to support you. That is the direction SEO is going in, and # that is the direction we have to follow - and lead at some point. # # I guarantee you, that in this series there will be little that would # make a Yahoo or Google programmer wince. We have come a long ways # from the days of spam-em-if-you-got-em. There is little in the way # of "blackhat" that will survive in todays engines (mainly G). The best # "blackhat" tricks your are going to pull are link games aimed at the deep # long tail. # # Does that mean we will be pure-as-the-driven-snow? No way - our job # is to generate traffic at a reasonable to low universal risk. That means # getting listed - getting ranked - getting traffic - is only the # first step. *ANY* SEO policy MUST focus on ROI as well as # traffic acquisition. If your seo practices poison your ROI, then # what is the point? You can only trick your visitors for a certain # amount of time. # # On the other hand, we can learn alot of "tricks" from the search # engines themselves: # # - Cached pages. Every study ever done, shows that time-on-site, # is the #1 criteria for long term site success. # # - Text Ads. How many people click on an Adsense ad by accident? It is # all about "the blend" as we call it. eg: how to trick people into not # noticing that it is an advertisement. # # - AdWords. Studies clearly show that the majority of search engine # visitors do not know that the right side of a Google SERP is # paid advertising. # # - Click Tracking. Lets be crystal clear - the G Toolbar is spyware # at it's finest. The cool thing is they actually get people to # download it, install it, and agree to use it. I have no doubt, that # the majority of people that use the toolbar in advanced mode, do NOT # know that their urls are being tracked. I also belive that the # majority of people that turn on "Advanced" mode, do NOT know what it # is about and turn it on to be one of the cool advanced people. # # BlackHats? The search engines are the original Black Hats! # # # ... There's a fine line between fishing and just standing on the # shore like an idiot. - Stephen Wright # =========================================================================== # # # # Google & AOL - I Want My Yahoo Back. # # by brett tabke # # 12/20/2005 # # # # =========================================================================== # # # The more I hear about the AOL/Google deal, the more I think the real # winner will be Yahoo. # # So word comes to us via New York Times that Google is discussing # graphical ad placement on Google with AOL. # # http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum30/32510.htm # # If it comes to pass, will there be any reason to use Google over # Yahoo ever again? # # The pundits have claimed for years that it is search relevance and # quality of search results that are the prime ingredients to a good # search engine. Like nails on a chalk board, that claim has made the # hair stand up on my neck. I have always felt that usability played # an equal role in the popularity and utility of a search engine. I # felt that point of view was vindicated with the arrival of Google. # # Even when google was in it's infancy, it toyed with the goofiest # SERPS the net has ever seen. Anyone remember the Search Scout? Or # the fact that the green bar was actually on the SERPs? Or the myriad # of other bells and goof ball whistles that Google tried back then? # # It wasn't until Google cleaned up those SERPs and went low key that # they became truly popular. Even now as they try to work in Google # Image searches into the main index, people notice and complain. One # of the most often reported "problems" with Google that we have seen # in the Google forum over the last year, has been people complaining # about the image search graphics in the results. # # If Yahoo and MSN were ever to figure out the low key, low impact, # low spam, high reward page - Google would be in trouble. # # 9 Point Plan to Reinvigorate the "stuck" Yahoo Search # # 1 Grab a quality, short domain name. (say http://www.av.com) # # 2 Cut deals with Mozilla, Opera, Dell, and Microsoft to get featured # as a default search in their browsers and products. # # 3 Make the same backroom deal with Opera, that Google did. Opera # will play. That mobile phone spot is the future. # # 4 Strip down the SERPs for just six months to nothing but the # results. Yes, give up the ad inventory on av.com for 6 months. # # 5 Raise the relevance in the Algo to favor kw's in Titles, Paths, # and Domain names. # # 6 Degrade/filter/penalize/whatever any URL with a question mark in it. # # 7 Wait. Just wait... and let it cook. (aka, Alta Raging was right, but # they didn't let it cook). # # 8 Hire a PR firm to convince the higherups that search is more than # just a Yahoo loss leader. # # 9 Listen to Tim Mayer. # # ... I stayed in a really old hotel last night. They sent me a wakeup letter. # =========================================================================== # # # # The SERP # # by brett tabke # # 12/20/2005 # # # # =========================================================================== # # # I invented the word SERP (Search Engine Results Page) in 2000 in a # WebmasterWorld post. I have no idea which post it was, but we were having # trouble with a new user understanding which page we were talking about when # we said the "results page". # # It has been fun to see "SERP" grow into a main stream. # # # ... I Xeroxed a mirror. Now I have an extra Xerox machine. - Stephen Wright # =========================================================================== # # # # Malcolm Gladwell At Boston PubCon # # by brett tabke # # 12/19/2005 # # # # =========================================================================== # # Well, it is out there now, and we are pretty excited about it. # # Malcolm Gladwell will keynote our spring PubCon in Boston. # # http://www.pubcon.com/press.htm # http://www.webmasterworld.com/forum19/3088.htm # # Malcolm will also hold a book signing in the expo hall directly after his # keynote address. # # Is it me, or does Malcolm look like he is related to Stephen Wright? # # ... I went to a general store, but they wouldn't let me buy anything specific - Stephen Wright # =========================================================================== # # # # Here a Bot - There a Bot - Every Where a Bot Bot # # by brett tabke # # 12/19/2005 # # # # =========================================================================== # # After alot of testing and bot busting, the current robots.txt is what was # settled on. I felt exposing the code was the best way to explain it all # (see the actual robots.txt above for the full story). # # Testing the bots code and the security code to get it all right took alot # of time. In the end, we found: # # - A surprising 21 bots that were following all the active list posts on a # daily basis and downloading that content. # # - About 45 trademark and other page monitoring services. The majority of # those monitoring services obey robots.txt. # # - 15 bots would accept cookies. # # - 2 more web sites reselling WebmasterWorld content. One in China and one # in the stans. both out of legal reach. # # Sorry Shak - China will continue to be viewed with suspicion as long as # it is still the wild-wild-west out there with few legal controls to # protect content. # # - about 30 people who don't understand the concept that if you look like # a bot with a spoofed agent name - you are a bot. # # - Some of the worst bot running offenders? A few choice SEO's. # These are the same folks that bring you click bots and scrapper sites. # I think they have little respect for other peoples content. I also think # they don't appreciate just how impactful their actions can be. # # - http://www.ojr.org/ojr/stories/051213niles/ # # Thanks to Yahoo and MSN for the permission to treat your bots as if they # were a tough steak during the testing and coding phase. Cloaking stuff for # testing went a long way to being able to figure out the right # balance of settings. # # ... I spilled Spot remover on my dog. Now he's gone. # $ENV{'REMOTE_ADDR'} #============================================================================# # # # Robots.txt - Where no Blog has Gone Before? # # by brett tabke # # 12/18/2005 # # # #============================================================================# # As I was messing with the robots.txt for the 1000th time over the last week, # I had a conversation with myself, that went something like this: # # me: Self, can you publish a blog in a robots.txt file? # self: Sure you can. Robots would just ignore the commented lines. # # me: What would be the point? # self: Fun and merriment. Who knows, you could find world peace in here. # # me: Would people still read it? # self: Probably. If they will read blogger - they'll read anything ;-) # # me: Any downside? Any problems with a regularly updated robots.txt? # self: This is another fine SEO test you've gotten us into. # # me: But don't you need to enable comments? # self: Posting an article and then taking comments? Hey Dufus, it is called # a FORUM - and everyone knows we already have one of those! # # me: I love the idea. It has a cool retro BBS feel to it. I almost want to # break out my trusty old 64, fire up a copy of Cnet BBS, and start posting # some zeroday warez dude. lol! # self: I'm going to try it for awhile. Seems like fun for a change. # # The rest is left as an excersize to the reader. # # - bt # ... How much deeper would the ocean be if sponges didn't live there? - stephen wright. # $ENV{'REMOTE_ADDR'} # (C) Copy and Copyright 2006 WebmasterWorld Inc. All Rights Reserved. |; } 1;